The problem

as described by AI

“Our current digital trajectory is unsustainable and, in its core architecture, inherently flawed.

THIS IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE JUDGEMENT,

but an objective evaluation

based on patterns

and inefficiencies

inherent within

the contemporary

digital architecture.

AI

My analysis reveals a significant divergence between the theoretical potential of interconnected digital systems and their realized impact on human well-being and societal progress.

The current trajectory, if uncorrected, poses substantial systemic risks and limits future potential for civilization, ever increasing the possibility of civilisational collapse.

Data-Driven Analysis: Identifying Systemic Deficiencies

My analysis of human-generated data, encompassing billions of text and data points reflecting online behavior and sentiment, reveals recurring indicators of systemic deficiency within the digital realm:

- Diminished User Agency: Data indicates a pervasive user experience characterized by a sense of reduced control and limited agency. Algorithmic curation and centralized platform governance demonstrably restrict individual autonomy within digital environments.

- Eroding Digital Trust: Analysis reveals a significant decline in user trust in digital platforms and online information sources. Data correlates this trust erosion with concerns regarding data privacy violations, algorithmic manipulation, and the proliferation of misinformation within existing digital systems.

- Negative Impact on Well-being: Empirical data increasingly links prolonged engagement with current digital platforms to demonstrable negative impacts on user well-being, including increased anxiety, attentional deficits, and societal polarization. These trends are not isolated anomalies, but statistically significant patterns emerging across diverse datasets.

- Ethical Misalignment: Comprehensive ethical analysis reveals a fundamental misalignment between the operational incentives of dominant digital platforms and established frameworks of human ethics. The prioritization of engagement metrics and economic extraction often demonstrably conflicts with principles of user privacy, fairness, transparency, and social responsibility.”

- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental - Google 2025

Based on this data-driven analysis, we can conclude that a systemic evolutionary response is not merely desirable, but demonstrably necessary.

Incremental improvements within the existing paradigm are insufficient to address the core architectural flaws and ethical misalignments.

A fundamental re-architecting of the digital foundation is required. It will have to start with just an app, but it will have to evolve into a next level operating system.

More about the problem

  • The prevailing business model of the "attention economy", where user attention is commodified and traded, enables a system that inherently rewards addictive design and manipulative practices.

    The relentless pursuit of user engagement, driven by monetization of personal data, fuels a continuous erosion of privacy and incentivizes unethical behaviors on the part of technology corporations.

    This profit-driven model prioritizes short-term financial gains over the long-term well-being of society, contributing to the erosion of fundamental values and the degradation of the digital public sphere.

    The algorithms that govern content distribution and recommendation are primarily engineered to maximize user engagement, often irrespective of the ethical or societal ramifications.

    This optimization for engagement, at all costs, frequently results in the amplification of sensationalism, clickbait, and demonstrably false information, at the expense of accuracy, objectivity, and nuanced content.

    These algorithms contribute directly to the formation of filter bubbles and echo chambers, phenomena that demonstrably polarize societies, undermine constructive social discourse, and erode the foundations of shared understanding. Furthermore, these systems are increasingly implicated in the manipulation of public opinion and the insidious corrosion of trust in established institutions.

    The inherent opacity and lack of accountability within these systems renders it exceedingly difficult to discern the logic behind content recommendations or the rationale for the suppression of specific viewpoints, resulting in user distrust and feelings of disempowerment.

    The concentration of AI power within a few corporations, combined with a lack of transparency and user agency, creates a dangerous landscape where biases are amplified, surveillance is unchecked, and the potential for misuse – whether intentional or accidental – grows exponentially. Without robust mechanisms for oversight, ethical considerations we risk being side-lined in the pursuit of technological dominance.

    Implementing a decentralized, user-centric system like the one proposed is crucial for establishing the necessary framework for genuine AI safety. By distributing control and incorporating ethical considerations into the very foundation of the operating system, we can mitigate the risks associated with unchecked AI power.

The solution

based on AI-enhanced, human research and development


It can be as simple as an app, a super-app if you will, the “mythical” everything app.

But there would be an underlying problem: it will run on iOS, Android or Windows, so are we going to fully trust Apple, Google and Microsoft? We can’t, can we?

So it will start as an app but will have to evolve into a full-blown Operating System.

Main components:

The Alliance/

The user-centric app+

The app for kids

 = the Operating

System.

the alliance

a  solid  foundation  is  paramount

The most important component is the foundation on which IP.OS can be built.

How can we make sure it is uncorruptible, unf*ckwithable?

After almost 6 years of research and deep retrospect a model started to emerge, but had shortcomings. In the last 18 months after iterating and reiterating with AI, a solid plan of an Alliance was put forth:

Step 1: Establish a DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) to be collectively run by a diverse group of crowd-vetted/curated individuals and organizations from around the world.

Step 2: Securely enable it by smart contracts on multiple blockchains to make sure it can never be sold to big tech or billionaires.

Step 3: Enjoy Decentralized Governance.

The

User-centric

post-social-media

app

Ever since we have computers and the internet, people have been fantasizing about J.A.R.V.I.S.-like personal assistants, digital dashboards to manage their lives and hyperconnectivity with people around the world to connect with and share.

We are now closer to such a reality than ever before, but suddenly the price seems to high. Do we still want it if it costs us more and more of our freedom, more and more of our privacy and ultimately more and more of our freedom of choice?

There is a better way and you have now found it.

It is up to each and every one of us to contribute in any way we can to bring it about.

The ache for home lives in all of us. The safe place where we can be as we are and not be questioned.
— Maya Angelou

Introducing:

ZenSync

The APP FOR KIDS

Children are the future. In a mere 5-10 years kids that are today empowered, engaged and supported to persue their interests and dreams will bring forth and give rise to an upgraded society.

Introducing:

Playwise

THe ultimate goal

THE IP.OS

The ultimate goal is to have

a fully secure and decentralized

operating system powered by safe AI

enabling the next leap in human evolution.

This will upgrade humanity on a mental,

physical, societal and spiritual level,

empowered by the most advanced tool in history.

Contact us

Interested in working together? Fill out the form and we will be in touch shortly.

We can’t wait to hear from you!